Holly Sockpuppets Redux

If I were a member of David “Non-Baldy” Cook’s entourage or management team I would seriously consider taking out a restraining order or even a cease and desist order on Mary Ann Ellis/Holly Sockpuppets and her various aliases immediately. RCA please take note. This is just not right even if it’s legal.

I’d publish a screen cap but I do not want to be perpetuating the wrong any further.

Why? Because one of Mary Ann’s more obvious aliases has published David’s address in Los Angeles complete with maps on how to get there and photos on one of the ‘super seecreet’ threads over at David Cook Uncensored. Seriously, a stalkers wet dream.

This has to be one of the most heinous and hurtful things Mary Ann/Holly has done. She supposedly lurves her some David “Non-Baldy” Cook but she sure has a strange way of showing it. The rug must be turning her on or sending her secret signals only she can hear.

I guess the new music and nearness of CD release is bringing on the crazy from the most unbalanced of Cooktards. This is some scary shiess in my mind because you cannot tell what will happen when some of them get their hot little hands on this info. Someone needs to tweet Andrew or Neil since they live at the same address. Get armed to the teeth, guys.

Discuss this post at Free The American Idols Yuku

Explore posts in the same categories: Uncategorized

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

You can comment below, or link to this permanent URL from your own site.

44 Comments on “Holly Sockpuppets Redux”

  1. burt Says:

    As I said on the other post, I’m not sure you can stop someone re-publishing details in the public domain but I hope something can be done. It makes my skin crawl that they have so little disregard for his well-being to post those details. Maps to the house certainly cross a line so I hope that’s enough to convince someone to take action.

    Also as I said earlier, someone should tweet Andrew and Neal so they have the choice to take action if they and David feel at risk. Posting on DCO is worthwhile along with contacting anyone else in David’s management or RCA through twitter. I wish I could do it but I won’t visit that scum site out of principle so I don’t have the links – part of me feels like if everyone had that attitude she wouldn’t have a platform but of course there’s no way for all innocent fans to know and if nobody visited we wouldn’t find this shit out.

    I’m sure they’re well aware of the crazies and that they know where they live but that’s different to them spreading the info around. Thankfully LA homes have good security and I’m sure they’re on the lookout for weirdos anyway.

  2. MysteriosoMan Says:

    He’s going to have to move to the boonies and put up a massive fence and gate like Clay did.

  3. michele Says:

    I agree, it’s not right. I just don’t think anything can be done because she hasn’t done anything illegal. There was a Law & Order episode a few years back covering this same exact issue. Some website posted the address, pictures of the security pad w/ code, map to the apt building and everything. Some looney girl killed a guy and McCoy tried to prosecute the webmaster but the law wouldn’t let him. I don’t think anything can be done unless an actual threat on David’s life is made. Unfortunately, that’s how the law is. The laws do need to be changed.

  4. nonna-muss Says:

    The best thing that can come of this is for all the real members there to finally see the crazy and leave. She’ll be left with all her sockpuppets to talk to. She can continue to pretend she has a legitimate and interesting message board instead of the laughing stock that it is.

  5. WilcoisAwesome Says:

    But isn’t all of his information private? I know one can opt out of their phone number and address from being published in the phone book, etc so if its not been published then theres a 50/50 chamce it was obtained illegally or something equally insane. Granted- in today’s world if you dig hard enough you can always find a little something but there’s like a million David Cook’s in the US so I can’t imagine how she got this information- I don’t think anyone would voluntarily give that up. And so the story unfolds…

    • burt Says:

      Not being a stalker and having no interest in where David, or anyone in the public domain lives, I don’t know for sure but I think house purchase details are public. Therefore, it would be relatively easy to track down his address, how much he paid (and potentially details of the rooms etc depending on who lived there before) when he bought his houses. Not to mention the websites that happily list all kinds of details about well known people. Add Google Streetview, aerial photos, maps, time and persistence and suddenly maps, photos etc are easily to locate. And that’s without actual in-person stalking.

      It’s just the world unfortunately and I’m sure they’re well aware of that particularly if it’s not the first time. And it isn’t.

      If someone has the inclination to find it then that’s one thing but sharing it is morally wrong even if it’s not illegal. Even if re-publishing photos and the actual address is OK, I’m not sure if publishing maps is. It’ll be interesting to see what, if anything, happens to the site. They have to know about her so it wouldn’t be a surprise if his people monitor it anyway and I’m sure David and friends are all well used to life in LA by now.

      • Jen Says:

        Real estate transactions can be public but it depends on the city. Some cities have their info online including owners’ names, some have the info but say the owner information is confidential, and some aren’t online at all. I can’t imagine the records are public in LA county but I don’t know. I also can’t imagine he’d buy it under his own name and not some sort of holding company. (I work in real estate. That kind of research is a major part of my job. I’m not a stalker, I swear. lol)

        I’d imagine David’s info was made public because he’s a celebrity. If I’m not mistaken it came through as a google alert a few months ago. I don’t have one set up for him but that’s what I read.

        Of course, I still think it’s scary that she posted it on a freakin’ message board.

      • freedavidcook Says:

        I was wondering why the info was out there because I’d be very surprised if the house wasn’t bought as part of a holding company. Many people do it that way. We have all our rental real estate under the name of a holding company.

      • Jen Says:

        Yeah definitely. Someone, maybe the Realtor, probably leaked the info. I can’t remember what kind of website it was posted to but it actually wasn’t from the fans being sketchy this time and fishing it out. At least when it first came out.

  6. MmmmBop Says:

    Christmas came early this year. Thanks for sending me to certain blogs, where real names, ages , weight and pictures of many posters are revealed.

  7. Karen D Says:

    David has been alerted on 2 fronts about this issue.

    • freedavidcook Says:

      He’s going to have to move to an armed militia compound at this rate.

    • nonna-muss Says:

      Well, that’s good to know and I hope it’s true. I figured he had people that watch out for that kind of thing, especially on a board known for insanity.

    • burt Says:

      Good to hear! Now let’s see what happens to the site.

      He’ll be fine. He’s not the first person to be subject to this sort of thing and I’m sure he has people around him who know how to deal with it. Thankfully the number of truly dangerous people who would act on the information are in a very low percentage. Would she herself even act on it?

      This just makes me see why people choose to live in gated communities!

  8. Cooks_FUFL Says:

    There are screenshots of the posts in question, and forumotion has been contacted about this situation. I truly hope the site is taken down. Nobody is really posting there now except the sockpuppets or people that don’t have access to the private threads. Of course, one of the puppets stated that she contacted “Holly” via PM, and that “Holly” didn’t know the pictures and address were up. Um, ok.

  9. WilcoisAwesome Says:

    CooksFUFL- good looking out. I contacted them after Sock Puppet #2 threatened to post my info, but apparently her confirming my email address publicly and the threats weren’t enough to actually do anything.

    • nonna-muss Says:

      One of the sockpuppets threatened to “hunt down” a poster that criticized her the other day. Way scary.

  10. WilcoisAwesome Says:

    Scary. I wasn’t genuinely worried that she’d post it and people would come to my house or apartment or anything-they have bigger fish named David to fry/stalk, it was merely the motivation behind it that really bothered me most, in hindsight. I’m genuinely hoping no one takes that info and stakes out his house, if indeed the info is correct. Even if it’s not – I feel badly for the person that actually lives there.

    • freedavidcook Says:

      She’s posted my real name and address and as you can see I’m still here unmolested. Whoopie!

      • MmmmBop Says:

        Maybe you are “non-molestable”. You know, age, weight, marital status.Count yourself lucky.

  11. Cooks_FUFL Says:

    Since Holly and her sockpuppets are reading here and sharing some of the information on DCU, I decided to post the DCU form terms of service on this site. How many of these terms has she broken? Why is that site still allowed to be up? I know Holly has been busy FLAILING with the thought that her name will be on DC’s “This Quiet Night” EP, but I wonder which name she will be using on that EP?? If you look at members who have been on DCU in the last 24 hours, there are at least 15 sockpuppet names on there. There may be others, but I have lost track!

    Forum Terms of service
    The moderators of this forum will try hard to edit or remove reprehensible messages as soon as possible. However, it is impossible for them to review all the messages. You thus admit that all the messages posted on this forum express the sight and opinion of their respective authors and not those of the moderators or the Webmaster (except messages posted by them) and consequently, they cannot be held responsible of the discussions.

    This forum uses cookies to store information on your computer. These cookies will not contain any personal information; they are only used to improve comfort while browsing. The address e-mail is only used in order to confirm the details of your registration as your password (and also to send you back your password if you forget it).

    – Aggressive or slanderous messages, as well as personal insults and critics, the coarseness and vulgarities, and more generally any message contravening the French laws are prohibited.
    – Messages who promote – or evoke – illegal practices are prohibited.
    – If you post informations which come from another site
    , look first if the site in question doesn’t forbid it. Show the address of the site in question in order to respect the work of their administrators!
    – Please post your messages only once. The repetitions are unpleasant and useless!
    – Please make an effort on grammar and spelling. SMS-style language (ex: r u sk8ing?) is not advised!

    Any message contravening the listing above will be edited or removed without additional notice or justification within deadlines which will depend on the availability of the moderators. Any abuse will involve the cancellation of the registration. Internet is neither an anonymous space, nor a space of no-right! We reserve ourselves the possibility of informing your access provider and/or the legal authorities of any malevolent behavior. An IP address of each poster is recorded in order to help us to make you respect these conditions.

    By clicking on ” I agree to these terms ” below:
    – You acknowledge to have fully read these current rules;
    – You commit yourself to respect unreservedly these current rules;
    – You grant the moderators of this forum the right to delete, move or edit any discussion subject at any moment.
    No posting of personal information on a celebrity or private member such as addresses, phone numbers or last names. General gossip about dating is fine, but no threats against any member or celebrity. You can express your likes and dislikes but state your opinions as speculation unless your statements are proven fact. Moreover, you must post in the forum at least twice to maintain your account. If you do not post within two days of account activation your membership will be deleted. This is for security of all our members.

    • freedavidcook Says:

      Thanks for that. She is clearly breaking the TOS on so many levels on that board but it is meaningless until someone turns her in to the board hosting company.

      Makes me laugh that she’s so easy to stir up. Yeah, I know her and her sooper seacrud squad make a lot of assumptions about people and try to research them down for embarrassing stuff but shit, she’s the only one that gets so stirred up that she hits the various sites talking smack about her over and over and over and over again rereading endlessly. She’s got some form of undiagnosed mental illness and spends so much energy on this. If she put that focus on something ‘real’ she could take over the world, or be president or end world hunger. Instead she pours all that energy into foaming at the mouth over a pop star, a television pop start at that. Super life fail.

  12. Cooks_FUFL Says:

    She (and her site) have been reported at least twice, and screenshots have been provided as proof.
    She has either lost her job or is on a mental break, because she and the puppets are on all the time. Why is she not looking for a job or getting help for her mental problems?
    I honestly don’t know if it’s all her, though, with a problem. When it came out that a model named Amanda would be in DC’s new video, real members looked up this woman’s information and basically ripped her to shreds while dissecting everything about her! That site is just middle aged women who put David up on a pedastal and want an escape from their own miserable lives. The posters who state they are only in their 20’s or 30’s are lying (not all, but most). For some strange reason, the real women on there stay and put up with the BS, instead of just starting another site.

    • nonna-muss Says:

      I heard she’s lost a lot of long time real members over the address and map, I hope it’s true. Reading your above post regarding TOS, it seems she’s broken all of those rules. She does it under a sockpuppet name and then she can say she didn’t do it and remove it a few days later. She’s a sick pup and a bully and a coward at the same time. The board can’t last much longer. I still don’t get how she doesn’t realize that all but a very few real members know what she’s up to. She still denies her antics and makes herself look like an even bigger ass than she already is.

    • Dani Says:

      If that’s true about the model, I must say kudos to David for his choice. She is stunning, even if she IS on that skanky Model Mayhem website. And a non-blond at that. Perhaps Mr. Cook has come over to the dark side 🙂

      • freedavidcook Says:

        Ha-ha! I hope it’s true just so Mary Ann/Holly will explode again. She really goes nuts if there is any hint of him dating a ‘model’

  13. Cooks_FUFL Says:

    Dani, she is in his video. She is not banging him. It’s not like he picked her out or anything. You sound like an infamous poster on DCU. Do you belong there?

    • burt Says:

      Cooks_FUFL haha! From what I know about DCU, I’m starting to think the same about more than one person posting here. There’s some very odd attitudes displayed on this blog by people claiming to be fans or ex-fans.

    • Dani Says:

      Excuse me Cooks_FUFL, but did I say anything about him banging her? All I said was kudos to him for his choice. FOR HIS VIDEO. Since his 2 previous videos had blond girls in them. FYI, I don’t go to that site, nor do I know anything about this sock person.

      On the other hand, YOU seem to be quite preoccupied with her and DCU. And who “belongs there”.

  14. Thorazine Says:

    Oh SNI-ZAP! How do we know who he is or isn’t banging? He’s a musician, she’s a model, the 2 go together like white on rice, lol. Sheeit, if he wasn’t trying to get some booty from all the girls in LA who will fuck most guys like him for a sandwich or at hello, then I gotta question his manhood, lol. I’ve no doubt he’s getting his swerve on anytime he feels the urge, cause at his age, with the opportunities he has to get primo ass – , (not old, beat outta shape, broke down,delusional BSC ass) – he’s a fool if he isn’t. He’s no choirboy, so if he bones the occasional model the fans should be happy.

  15. Thorazine Says:

    LOL, what’s an ‘odd’ attitude? I may resemble that remark, lol. Must there be groupthink even on this board, albeit in a more subtle fashion, than expressed on DCO or DCU? Will there be a ‘true’ fan test administered at the end of the week? 🙂 Cook is fair game for irreverency and mocking at times along w/his fans. I’m immune to the hair, his supposed good looks, the so called ‘superiority’ of his voice and songs and I don’t subscribe to the notion that he was ‘all that’ and broke Idol. Heresy, you say, hee hee! Stone me, for my odd attitude overtakes me at times, and can’t be tamed 🙂

    • freedavidcook Says:

      No groupthink here that I’m aware of. I just want to keep posting out the silly and willfully stupid like Holly Sockpuppets, Needacock, Pizza Screamer Daina and Wehoe. Cooks just some guy but his fans bring the ha-ha.

    • burt Says:

      LOL maybe you do Thorazine! 😉 Seriously though, I’m not pointing fingers – can’t even remember who made the comments I’m thinking of, it was just an observation. By “odd” I meant the passive/aggressive, “I love him but all he’s doing is shit”, type stuff.

      I don’t expect everyone here to have the same thoughts or be blinded by him (in any way) but I do wish the criticisms were valid or had basis. Seems like a lot of people are fans of him and here mainly because they’re annoyed by his fans so it’s not really surprising if they try to defend him. I’ve said it before but this place is much better when focused on the fans not picking faults in every turn he makes in his career when we have no idea why he did any of it (if indeed there was a reason). And before anyone suggests it, no, I don’t think everyone has to be a fan of his.

      I can see how rumors start as easily here as elsewhere too, the difference is here it’s not (I assume) done on purpose.

      Hope my rambling cleared up what I meant!

  16. Jessie Says:

    DCU is starting to implode. Yesterday someone called either Diane or Sharon a sockpuppet. I knew she’d be banned, but apparently Holly has deleted everyone with 0 posts because she says she wants to go back to a smaller board.(Yeah we believe you Holly). It boogles my mind that she assumes that its lurkers who are giving up info on her. The map and address were posted in the super secret restricted threads which means someone with access passed it along. In other words, someone who posts alot. I cannot figure out how her thought process works. Then again it probably doesn’t. Anyway the crazy is still out in full force. I used to feel sorry for some of these women. Thought they were too trusting or a bit naive, but now it’s apparent they’re just plain stupid. Get a clue idiots.

    • Cooks_FUFL Says:

      She has now suspended Private Messaging on the site, and she even called out Cookphile for having the same IP address as another poster. DUH! It’s always been so damn obvious that Cookphile had at least one other identity, although I suspect that she had more than one. Also, people are supposed to avoid coming to this blog because you are just trying to bring down her site. Oh, if she only realized that she is doing that herself.

  17. A Mary Ann Ellis victim Says:

    Mary Ann Ellis is dangerous!!

  18. Karen D Says:

    She’s banning regular members now claiming that they are specific screennames on here! LOL Delusional.
    What is Cookphile’s other name? LOL I’m really curious about that one. I think she’s banned half of the board. Who is left to even talk? Oh wait, she has 20 screennames of her own to talk to.

    • nonna-muss Says:

      Only 20? Why are you being so kind Karen? I’m sure there are some that haven’t even seen the light of day yet.

      • freedavidcook Says:

        Sounds like she’s doing at DCU the same thing she did at RHT. It will end up being her babbling to herself in different sockpuppet outfits

  19. Cooks_FUFL Says:

    She continues her banning of people over on DCU. She and the sockpuppets (and even the idiotic real posters) keep referring to this blog as the “Free Baldy” site” and they are saying how horrible and rude we all are for calling him Baldy. When a long time member posted a link to the title of this blog, showing the real name of the site, the link immediately disappeared, and the long time member was called a liar by a sockpuppet. (So much for respecting each other on that site.) Then, the long time member was banned. I also notice that Holly is posting names of members when they are banned now. If you look at a banned member’s posts, it will say their first name and “Guest”. I hope people are smart enough to not use their real first names when registering!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: