Archive for September 2012

Congratulations to Jennie Nye & Andy Skib…

September 27, 2012

….and sorry about the freakin’ clueless fans obsessing over getting the happy couple a wedding gift. I would not be surprised if the crazier/bolder don’t try to crash the wedding. I hope that on Saturday everything goes smoothly and stalker-free. May the girl with the bad tattoo stay far away.

Turns out over at a certain Facebook page – Skiblets – https://www.facebook.com/groups/501446366536736/ – they are having drama over this wedding gift idea. Apparently the bridal registry wasn’t publicly posted for the fans but you know how some seem to have superior Googling without Probable Cause skillz and found the Macy’s registry.  Some think, and rightly so, that since Andy didn’t include the fan base in announcing the wedding registry it is not appropriate to send a gift. Typically the same ones that usually trample all over the rules of society think they have every right to send a gift and anyone that thinks otherwise is a hater. Drama has ensued.

I am just happy that a few members of Skiblets have enough common sense to realize that sending a wedding gift from the registry isn’t such a good idea. Be happy for them instead of sending any gift. Love is getting rarer in our world it seems and they’ve been lucky enough to find it in each other.

Sky Goat Does Not Approve!

September 6, 2012

Law Soots

September 5, 2012

Today I received a very interesting comment for the site awaiting moderation, one from Ms. Kerry Kolsch. It was interesting and it made me laugh. See below.

I am advising you that you have published lies about me on the Internet that are actionable:

“Practicing Lawyer in Florida, but she never mentioned her mother and her were both involved in a real estate scam deal that resulted in her mother’s disbarment in 2004 and according to this filed legal paperwork Kerry notarized a Deed that was proven later to have a fraudulent signature on it. You can see the document if you scroll down to the bottom. it is ‘Exhibit D”

My mother never had a trial and nothing was ever “proven.” She had a medical condition that kept her from participating in her defense and when the Florida Bar would not give her a continuance, she walked out of a hearing. She was a pro bono attorney for twenty years helping the poor and the elderly. The only thing she was guilty of was poor record keeping because she used volunteer help. The Florida Bar never asked me about the notarized Deed nor did they question the witnesses on the Deed. If they did, we all would have conferred that it was authentic. The truth is that my record with the Florida Bar is 100% unblemished. Never have I had a complaint made against me. Never has the Florida Bar accused me of any wrong doing or questioned me about the so called “fraudulent Deed”. The Deed was in fact a legally and properly executed Deed. The transfer of that property has never been set aside. I suggest that you have a legal responsibility here. You can make fun of my Lambert writing all you want, but I will not tolerate you defaming me professionally as a writer or as an attorney.

“However, clearly once a website operator is notified by a victim of defamation or by the victim’s internet lawyer,
that defamatory material has been published on one of their websites,
they can no longer claim they did not know or that they did not have
reason to believe. They are now under an obligation to take reasonable
steps to remove the material.”
There is therefore a very powerful argument to conclude that every website operator that has received a written notification by a victim of defamation or their internet lawyer, automatically becomes liable for defamation unless the material is being removed immediately.

www.bainscohen.com/

Oh Kerry, I love that you used the bottom third of  someone elses writing without attribution. Those words aren’t your own, they came from this EZine article – http://ezinearticles.com/?Are-Website-Hosts-Responsible-For-Defamatory-Comments-Posted-On-Their-Websites?&id=5463073 written by the same lawyers in London that you posted a link to.

First of all, I stated it was my opinion that your writing was banal and trite, that’s just my opinion. But it’s an opinion that is echoed on just about every online blog/site/article I’ve seen involving your writing. Even you have to admit there are quite a few misspellings at the very least in many things you’ve written and posted. When did having an opinion become against the First Amendment of the United States of America.

Second, the information I listed about your mother losing her license and you being the notary on the transaction were all taken from court documents on file with the State of Florida. I didn’t make that up, it exists, and you cannot sue someone for stating something that can be proven by filed documents in a court of law. I didn’t rule that the signatory was forged, the courts of Florida did. It’s available online for anyone with a few seconds of time to Google. It’s freely available to anyone access the Florida Supreme Court document briefs – http://www.floridasupremecourt.org/clerk/briefs/2009/401-600/09-564_ROR_ada.pdf

Personally I don’t know if you’re a good or a crappy lawyer, it’s not like writing where you see with your own eyes and make your own review or judgement. Good you’ve not had a complaint because I know those that Google about you have never turned up paperwork or any hint that you’ve done anything wrong.

I suspect what has happened is you have tried frantically to get WordPress to remove what I’ve said and they’ve refused so now you think you’ll bully me into it. Not happening. Now I have been asked nicely to remove things and I have but since you’ve chosen to take a hostile approach well….

Good luck with that law soot and be sure to tell that internet lawyer how you took something one of them had written and tried to fob it off as your own writing.

Sorry, Adam Lambert still sucks and he is more of a flop with each passing day…